Legal requirements and opportunities of circular construction

Published on 20.01.2026

Dr. Christine Lemaitre talks to lawyer Michael Halstenberg about the legal framework for construction products, the reuse of materials and the practical challenges of circular construction – and shows how new standards can pave the way for more sustainable construction.

Why circular construction is so important

Circular construction means planning and implementing buildings in such a way that materials can be used, reused and recycled for as long as possible. The aim is to avoid waste, conserve resources and significantly reduce the environmental impact of construction.
During the discussion, it becomes clear that, legally speaking, there is currently little distinction between new, used, sustainable or circular building products. The only decisive factor is that building products meet the applicable technical requirements – regardless of whether they are new or reused.

Info

Circular construction means that materials are not disposed of after a single use, but are repaired, reused or recycled. This creates cycles instead of waste.

Legal requirements for construction products

Building law in Germany sets clear requirements for construction products, especially if they are relevant to safety. These include, among other things:

• Stability
• Fire protection
• Thermal and sound insulation
• Health protection (no harmful substances)

These requirements apply to all construction products – regardless of whether they are newly manufactured or come from demolition.
Many simple components such as door handles, skirting boards or nails are unproblematic. However, as soon as safety-related properties are affected, performance values must be known and verifiable.

Info

Construction products must be safe. They must not pose a risk to people and must meet minimum technical standards – even when they are reused.

Material passports: transparency for every construction phase

A key topic is material passports: these document which materials are used in a building, their quality and how they can be reused later. The discussion shows in a practical way how material passports are created and what added value they offer for planners, builders and owners.

New Construction Products Regulation: A first step

The new EU Construction Products Regulation EU-Bauproduktenverordnung has been in force since 7 January 2025. It applies directly in all Member States and addresses issues such as reuse and recyclability for the first time.
However, it is currently of little practical help. Only when new mandates are issued and harmonised product standards are developed on the basis of this regulation will concrete requirements for manufacturers arise – and with them clear framework conditions for circular construction products.

Info

The new Construction Products Regulation is intended to pave the way for more reuse and recycling in the construction industry in the long term. However, concrete standards are still largely lacking.

Reuse of building components: What is the status quo?

In practice, reuse is most common where materials can be easily tested. These include, in particular:

• Steel beams
• Solid wood
• Some reinforced concrete components

Guidelines and initial standards already exist for these materials, for example from Brandenburg or the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
A key problem is the lack of documentation: for new products, the manufacturer provides tested performance values. For used components, however, the origin, condition, loads and remaining service life must first be determined at great expense.

Info

In order for a used component to be reused, it is necessary to know where it came from, how it was used and what performance it is still capable of.

Challenges:

During the discussion, it becomes clear that circular construction is currently still largely failing due to existing structures:

• Building regulations are designed for new products, not reuse.
• Testing costs are often more expensive than using new products.
• There is a lack of uniform assessment standards.
• Public and private actors are not aligned.

Practical limits of the circular economy

• Material scarcity: Building materials are often not available in sufficient quantities for complete reuse.

• Transport costs can negate climate protection benefits if materials are transported over long distances.

• Downcycling is common: Demolition material is used in road construction, for example, instead of being reused in its original form.

Key takeaways

• Circular construction products and material passports are crucial for sustainable construction.
• The circular economy reduces waste, saves resources and lowers long-term costs.
• Cooperation between all stakeholders is key to success.
• Those who understand the concepts can actively contribute to the sustainable transformation of the construction sector.

Conclusion:

Huge opportunity, lots of hurdles

The discussion clearly shows that circular construction is central to a sustainable building transition, but currently still faces legal, technical and organisational barriers. Without new standards, reliable testing procedures and adapted legal frameworks, reuse often remains a special case.
At the same time, it is clear how great the potential is. Those who are working on standards, guidelines and assessment models today are laying the foundations for a construction industry that conserves resources, reduces emissions and truly understands buildings as material stores for the future.

Tip

Consider reuse from the outset. Plan projects so that components can be documented, tested and easily reused later. Use existing guidelines, work with experts and support the development of new standards – this will make circular construction feasible step by step rather than the exception.

This knowledge was donated by:

Michael Halstenberg
Michael Halstenberg is a former Ministerial Director and lawyer with many years of experience at the interface of construction, the construction industry and construction law. After studying law in Cologne and passing his second state examination at the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf, he joined the financial administration of the state of North Rhine-Westphalia in 1987 and subsequently worked in various ministries of the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, including in the areas of housing, tenancy law, the construction industry, ecological construction, construction technology, and construction and public procurement law. From 1988 to 2004, he worked in the North Rhine-Westphalia Ministry of Construction, most recently as head of the ‘Construction Industry, Construction Technology, Procurement Law’ group. At the same time, he was EU advisor to the German Building Ministers' Conference from 2000 to 2004. From 2004 to 2009, he was Ministerial Director at the Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development, where he headed the ‘Federal Building, Construction and Construction Industry’ department. Since 2009, Michael Halstenberg has been working as a lawyer, currently at the law firm Franßen & Nusser Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB in Berlin and Düsseldorf. In addition, he has been involved in numerous honorary positions for many years, including as deputy chairman of the advisory board of RG-Bau, deputy chairman of the board of the German Council for Construction Law, member of the Legal Committee of the German Sustainable Building Council and chairman of the board of trustees of the Institute for Building Research.